Partner Compensation Structures – Executive Committee Monarchy (Part 3 of 7)
This is the 3rd article in a series of 7 discussing the different kinds of partnership compensation structures that law firms tend to adopt. In Part 1 we discussed the Monarch structure, and in Part 2 the Parity structure.
Executive Committee Monarchy
Description
Both of the prior structures are usually only found in small firms of ten partners or fewer. In a larger firm, the Monarch structure may be expanded to a ruling executive committee. In this situation a rather stable and predictable executive committee functions like a single monarch. Usually they are the founding partners or otherwise the most experienced lawyers in the firm.
When It Works Well
This structure works when the
executive committee, as a body, has the same attributes as the type of single monarch that functions well in this system. In addition, the members of the executive committee must have compatible values and priorities, so that they can come to a consensus about the compensation to be paid to themselves and other lawyers. In this highly subjective structure, the more lawyers in the firm, the more important the role trust plays among the lawyers.
When It Works Poorly
The committee approach can still have all of the failures of the single monarch. This tends to occur if the executive committee engages in “group think,” relying mainly on each other for viewpoints, and tending to tell each other what they all want to hear. They need to stay in touch with the other partners, have the ability to respond to their concerns, and recognize their contributions, for this to be successful.
This structure begins to crumble as larger numbers of lawyers mature in their rainmaking capability and begin to challenge the “Junta.” The senior partners may wane in their productivity […]
